Title: An Odd
Path to Success
Name: Elizabeth
Moll
Personal Response to
Film:
The Seventh Seal directed and written by Ingmar Bergman holds the
key to allegoric success. That is, if you’re able to actually keep your eyes
open the entire movie. I could not. I learned more about The Seventh Seal from reading about it, than I did from watching
it. It is not particularly obscene or offensive. In fact, the 1957 film has
obvious thematic differences than modern philosophical films; nevertheless, it
has a strange way of making me cringe. Parts of the film, like when Jof was
forced to dance like a bear at the inn, had me involuntarily looking away. The
weirdness extruded from the film on many occasions in which I was unable to
psychologically cope. This all being said, there is meticulous attention to
detail that Bergman was able to portray to us regardless of its low-budget
making.
Summary to Critical
Article:
Norman
N. Holland (1959) wrote a wired critical analysis he titled “’The Seventh
Seal’: The Film as Iconography”. In this analysis, Holland parted with outside
sources and focused the bulk of it on seeing the film for exactly how it is. A
step-by-step examination showed how there is deep biblical meaning throughout
the film. As Holland (1959) put it, “Bergman is going beyond the Totentanz, trying to answer the further
question: If death is the only certainty, where is God?” (p. 267). Holland suggests
that the question is exactly what the Knight, Antonius Block, is searching for.
Upon that search, and his masterful game play with Death itself, Antonius
happens upon many viewpoints. One that Holland points out is how the
townspeople blame God for their misfortune, particularly the black plague that
plays a paralleling story to the film. Then Holland is confronted with the
religious pressed crucifixion of the witch. Then, above all, Antonius meets
Jof, Mia and their baby. Who Holland says is a straight and clear reference to
the Holy family (Joseph, Mary and baby Jesus). Holland makes simple of the multifaceted
film into a religious journey for both the main character, Antonius, and
viewer. By implying that Bergman laid the answers out for us, Holland (1959)
writes, “the crusader’s quest gives us the answer. Though the knight himself
seems to never learn it – or to learn that he has learned it” (p. 267).
Response to Critical
Article:
Although
I’m flattered by Norman N. Hollands suggestion that I as a viewer knew all the ‘obvious’
answers and religious allegory, I’m afraid to say I had really no clue. I
enjoyed reading Hollands article, if for nothing else, it allowed me the
opportunity to understand the film without having to figure out all the answers
for myself (even though he thought it was apparent). However, Holland did gift me with what I was
looking for: A clear religious reference for Jof and Mia. Holland (1959) wrote,
“The Seventh Seal finds God for us –
or at least another certainty than Death – not in the wormwood-and-gall
institutional religion of suffering and crucifixion, but in the simple life of
a strolling actor and juggler named Jof (Joseph), his girl-wife Mia (Mary), and
their baby” (p. 268). This confirmed my original feeling that Bergman created
Jof and Mia different from other characters. Holland wrote a solid article
portraying exactly how Jof in particular was easily referenced to the Holy
family. Such as, “Jof is the only one who can see the allegorical figure of
Death” (Holland,
1959, p. 268). That is, besides Antonius. Once Holland points
that out, a lot more of the film came together for me. I could easily see how
Antonius not only saved them, but protected them and ultimately gave his life
for them.
Holland
really gave a basic overview of the many religious references in the film. I’m
grateful to be able to go back, after reading his article, and pick up on those
things that he cited. Holland didn’t go much beyond that, which I really
appreciate. Since the films complexity goes deeper than what Holland wrote
about, it gives the viewer the opportunity to discover more on his/her own.
Even though I have a hard time getting through the whole film, I would take
more time studying the chess game or even the ocean that hints as a symbol
throughout the film.
Consideration of
Critic’s Use of Critical frameworks/concepts:
Norman
N. Holland’s 1959 article viewed The
Seventh Seal with a formalist eye. The structure of Hollands article was
formulated around the plot of the film. This was a key indicator that he used a
formalist approach in his article. At the same time, he used the plot to drive
a unified idea around the religious allegory and symbols used. A great deal of
time was spent on what Holland believed to be writer/director Bergman’s secret
meaning that Holland charitably exposed for his readers. This gave viewers a
meaningful foundation for watching or re-watching the film.
Film Analysis:
At times, certain scenes of
puzzling films will pull together several elements to create meaning for the
viewer. In The Seventh Seal, this
type of scene was during the final chess game between Antonius and Death. A few
important elements were combined in this scene that helped make sense of a lot
of questions leading up to this point. Right before this part of the scene, Jof
found Antonius and Death playing chess, then rushed Mia and their baby to get
away. Antonius knew Jof had found them, but because Death was facing the opposite
direction, he did not. The scene starts with several over the shoulder straight
cuts between Death and Antonius. This is in silence. Nothing but the narration
provides sound for the viewer. The focus at this point is on narrative, rather
than any elaborate thematic style. What made this scene great was the intricate
details that Bergman allowed the viewer to participate in.
The elements being pulled together
here are the allegoric Jof, Mia and baby, the symbolic chess game and the rescuer,
Antonius, who needed to make meaning of his life and did just that within this
scene. As mentioned before, the scene starts with the two playing chess, the
game that is literally life or death for Antonius, and an opportunity to
out-wit Death (whether Antonius actually wins the game, or not). Death is
convinced Antonius is hiding something. Then as Antonius commits to saying
there is nothing to hide, Death ironically says that nothing escapes him, then asks Antonius if he's afraid. This
happens moments before Antonius decisively knocks pieces of the chess game
down, allowing for Death to cheat when replacing them. What is interesting, is
that immediately before Antonius knocks the pieces over, he briefly looks up. This
moment of slight head lift is the decisive moment where Antonius decides not to
be afraid; therefore, giving his life for Jof, Mia and the baby. The next
moment Antonius looks up, beyond Death, is when the camera takes a subjective
point of view to see the wagon pulling away, out of the woods. His plan worked.
No comments:
Post a Comment